Getting My h4831sc load data To Work
Getting My h4831sc load data To Work
Blog Article
I picked up a 50ct. box of 160 Nosler Accubonds, but I'm hesitant to melt away the powder and projectiles on workup when all I have is fifty bullets. But I really want to find a bullet inside the a hundred and sixty class that my more mature rifle likes.
I gave up on it and went to other powder once the new powder was establishing more strain and was slower than the outdated stuff. I do not try to remember if I even experimented with normal h4831 or not; I'm wondering not. Simply click to grow...
4gr of H4831sc and Federal 215 primers. I discovered this combo produces .5MOA groups with velocity about 3020fps out of a 26" barrel. I use this exact powder in my 300wm taking pictures 180gr supplements, so It can be pleasant to own one particular powder for each.
243, and a number of the loads I've started off with include, you guessed it, H-4831sc. This time I'm intending to shoot the IMR7828 loads to start with, accompanied by the W780 loads just so there will not be any surprises when the H-4831sc loads display a shotgun pattern! Who is familiar with, I just may well find a use for it In fact.
INgunner54 stated: It's been a little bit, but I did get some 4831 SC to try. Identified a node and shot some teams.
Did you at any time consider H4831sc in you 300wsm and 215 bergers. I've a 300wsm now. Taking pictures 180g with H4350 at 2940fps with standard chamber. Asking yourself What to anticipate with 215 bergers with H4331sc?
Everyone loading 7mm Rem Mag with H4831sc? How are the effects, any data you are able to share? Also needs to point out I have some ELD-X one hundred seventy five's I want to examination out, Should you have information on that too.
and it is h4831 vs h4831sc advisable to spend money on some new load data guides. powder composition and chemistry can does transform over time. 4831 powder of decades ago just isn't exact same as what is available. which is why anyone serious about reloading safely and securely will likely have essentially the most current load data books to confer with.
WA I would suggest a slower burner that can give greater scenario density like H1000 or IMR 7977, particularly if you happen to be loading heavies very long.
It can be funny how over time loading many unique cartridges in many various rifles which i h4831sc have never received acceptable conclude results with H-4831 or perhaps the short-Minimize Variation.
Operate your load up with the precise powder (sc or normal) and good deal that you are applying while. Exact melt away amount doesn't suggest it is going to behave "just" precisely the same. I have witnessed over one hundred fps difference between sc and mil-surp many H4831.
It h4831sc has been a little bit, but I did get some 4831 SC to test. Discovered a node and shot some teams. I shot a .six five shot team today. It is really somewhat slower than H1000, but shoots great. Many thanks for the advice, it's fantastic to realize that I have received solutions when one particular or the other powder is dried up.
Southwest Idaho I tried H4831sc in my 300 WM but had significantly better velocity and precision with H1000. I might alternatively use a slower burning powder with 215g tablets.
I sawed just one in 50 % to see how thick the jackets had been, and so they ended up conveniently 2 times as thick to be a fifty-grain hollow point was. Ditto for your 64-grain Electrical power Place, as these bullets are constructed for deer, not prairie puppies or woodchucks. You now know anything I understand about the 22-250 and gradual-burning powders, and I do not know just about anything at all concerning the 223. I doubt that you are going to get anywhere with that cartridge and 4831, but let's know the way it goes.